![]() CLARK POLLARD GAGLIARDI
FOR THIRD QUARTER
2005
To view previous newsletters, please click here.
COSMETIC
SURGERY
The Income Tax Act permits a medical expense
credit for an amount paid to a medical practitioner in respect of medical
services - this could include items such as cosmetic surgery, botox
injections, calf implants, hair transplants, rhinoplasty and breast
augmentation, facelifts, liposuction and tooth bleaching. PERSONAL
CARE HOMES In
a May 5, 2005 External Technical Interpretation, Canada Revenue Agency (CRA)
note that if an individual is certified as suffering from a physical or
mental handicap and, as a result, receives care, or the care and training,
at a particular place, which has the required equipment, facilities or
specially trained personnel, the expenditures may qualify as a medical
expense. For
example, fees paid to an institution which has staff specially trained to
deal with Alzheimer’s disease will usually qualify as a medical expense. TUITION
FEES In
a June 7, 2005 External Technical Interpretation, CRA notes that tuition
fees may be eligible for a medical expense tax credit if the student is
suffering from a physical or mental handicap, the severity of which is
such that the student “requires” (not merely “benefits from”) the
equipment, facilities or personnel specially provided by the school and,
which is not available in the public school system. An
appropriately qualified person must certify this. PARENTS
MOTOR
VEHICLE LOG BOOK In
a March 14, 2005 External Technical Interpretation, CRA reminds employers
that they are required to maintain records so that the employee’s total
employment income can be reported. This
includes making every reasonable effort to ensure that an employee
maintains a log book in respect of the use of an employer-provided motor
vehicle. OVERSEAS
EMPLOYMENT TAX CREDIT A
Canadian resident employee may receive an income tax credit if employed
throughout at least six consecutive months with a specified employer for
the performance of services outside Canada in connection with a contract
related to, among other things, engineering activities. SPECIAL
WORKSITE The
Income Tax Act excludes from income allowances for board, lodging and
transportation paid to employees at temporary special worksites. In
an Internal Technical Interpretation, CRA notes that even though a
contract may extend beyond two years, the duties could still be of a
“temporary” nature, thereby resulting in a tax-free allowance.
TRUCKERS In
a May 19, 2005 Tax Court of Canada case, the taxpayers were married and
employed to drive the employer’s trucks on long distance trucking in
Canada and the United States. CRA
disallowed their deduction for meals, showers and incidental expenses on
the basis that the Income Tax Act only permits a travel expense deduction
if the taxpayer must make disbursements for meals and lodging.
In this case, most of the time the taxpayers slept in the truck
cab. Some
Good News! The
Court noted that CRA’s objection is incorrect. Now
Some Bad News The
taxpayers deducted $61.50 per day for meals, without receipts, on the
basis that these were the rates established by the Treasury Board at that
time to be paid as a non-taxable travel allowances to employees of the
Government of Canada. The
Court noted that this is not relevant.
However, the Court permitted $40.00 per day with a 50% addback
because of Section 67.1. Also,
the cost of the showers was deductible as a component of lodging. Editor’s
Comment CRA
now permits, without receipts, under the Simplified Method $15.00 per meal
times three meals for a total of $45.00 per day, subject to a 50% addback. HOME
OFFICES In
a May 26, 2005 External Technical Interpretation, CRA was asked for
guidance as to whether an employer should complete Form T2200 where there
is no contract of employment but the employee does incur home office
expenses. CRA
notes that where it is tacitly understood by the employer and the employee
that the office in the home be provided and that the required conditions
are met, the employer should issue a T2200 and the employee should be able
to deduct expenses. CRITICAL
ILLNESS INSURANCE (CII) A
June, 2005 Supreme Court of Canada case in Quebec struck down a law
prohibiting private health coverage in Canada.
This has made CII coverage a more attractive option by introducing
the possibility of private health coverage in Canada.
Currently, private health coverage is mostly accessed through the
United States or, more recently, Asia. CII
policies are a hedge against the public medical system deteriorating, or
not being available on a timely basis. In
a December 9, 2003 External Technical Interpretation, CRA note that if the
CII policy is provided by the corporation to the owner-manager in his/her
capacity as a employee, and not a shareholder, the premiums will be
deductible to the employer. Assuming
that the premiums only provide for group CII, and do not contain any
return of premium, there would be no taxable benefit.
OFFICE
IN THE HOME
In a Tax Court of Canada case, the Court
accepted the deductions for the office in the home on the basis that it was
used on a regular and continuous basis for meeting clients. The
fact that this doctor met most of his patients at the Clinic or at the
nursing homes, and only had about one or two appointments per week at his
own home did not prohibit the deduction. The
Court noted that meeting with patients may occur by telephone.
Patients and staff telephoned the doctor often and regularly at his
home office for consultation, advice and to discuss cases. LEASES The
Income Tax Act permits a lessee and a lessor to jointly elect to treat a
lease as a capital lease in computing the income of the lessee such that the
rental payments made by the lessee will be treated as blended payments of
principal and interest. The
lessee will be able to claim capital cost allowance and deduct the interest
portion of each rental payment. This
only applies for leases of more than one year and does not apply on
“prescribed property” including property that has a value less than
$25,000, intangible property, and exempt property - office furniture or
office equipment, electronic data processing equipment, motor vehicles,
trucks or tractors and certain buildings. INTERNET
FEES In
a May 30, 2005 Internal Technical Interpretation, CRA notes that internet
connection fees paid by a self-employed person to earn income may be allowed
under the Income Tax Act. However,
if the fees are related to a home office and contain varying degrees of
personal and business elements, a pro-ration must be made. MANAGEMENT
FEES PAID TO A SPOUSE In
a May 24, 2005 Tax Court of Canada case, Mrs. W deducted a $32,000
management fee to her husband from her self-employed real estate business
income. No record was kept for
the services performed. Taxpayer
Loses CRA
successfully argued that for an expense to be deductible there must be a
“legal obligation to pay”. IMPORTANCE
OF RECORDKEEPING In
a June 17, 2005 Tax Court of Canada case, the taxpayer carried out a
discount store as a proprietorship in which many of the expenditures and
revenues were on a cash basis. Taxpayer
Loses The
Court noted that because of the CRA auditor’s methodical and thorough
examination of the records available, the taxpayer was unable to rebut the
Minister’s assumptions. The
taxpayer’s difficulties stemmed from inadequate recordkeeping. INDEPENDENT
CONTRACTOR VS. EMPLOYEE STATUS CRA
is aggressively reassessing in this area and have revisited same companies
over and over again - for example, in one case, the workers were found to be
independent contractors in 1995 and 2000 and are again being attacked by CRA
in 2005. There
are a number of important issues such as liability for Employment Insurance
(EI), Canada Pension Plan (CPP), withholding taxes at source, preparation of
T4s, and deductibility of expenses by the workers. Important side issues include the worker’s entitlement to
employment-related benefits such as vacation pay and wrongful dismissal
settlements. The
Courts are now looking at the joint intention of the worker and the payer as
one of the important factors in determining the status. SOURCE
DEDUCTIONS If
a corporation declares a bonus payable to an employee, the bonus must be paid
within 179 days after the yearend. Therefore,
the income tax, CPP and, if applicable, employment insurance must be paid in the
following month, either on the 3rd, the 10th or the 15th, depending on the
remittance period. If
the source deductions are not paid on time, the corporation may be assessed a
late filing penalty. SALARIES
TO ADULT CHILDREN In
an April 15, 2004 Tax Court of Canada case, Mr. F owned all the shares of a
corporation which employed as key significant employees his adult children.
In bonusing down to the annual business limit, bonuses were declared to
the children $136,639 and $50,000 respectively.
CRA disallowed as a deduction most of the bonuses on the basis they were
not incurred to earn income. Taxpayer
Wins! The
Court permitted the bonuses and noted that the services provided by the adult
children played a material role in the financial success of the business. DIRECTOR
LIABILITY In
a May 19, 2005 Tax Court of Canada case, Mr. M bought a flower shop from Mr. C
and left Mr. C to manage the corporation. The
corporation was “run extremely poorly” and was deficient in GST remittances
by $61,216. Mr. M, the sole
director, was assessed with personal liability for the $61,216. Taxpayer
Loses THIRD
PARTY PAYMENTS In
a March 24, 2003 Tax Court of Canada case, the taxpayer paid $19,828 to third
parties in respect of the family residence including mortgage, insurance, taxes,
electricity, telephone, cable service, repairs and maintenance as stipulated in
the Marriage Separation Agreement. The
Income Tax Act permits a deduction for third party payments if the Court Order
or Agreement specifically refers to these tax implications.
The purpose is to ensure that the parties in question are fully aware of
the fiscal consequences resulting from the payments.
Taxpayer Loses The
Court disallowed the deduction because there was no written document confirming
the tax consequences. RETROACTIVE
CHILD SUPPORT AWARDS An
Alberta Court of Appeal case Ruled that when the income of a person paying child
support goes up, the obligation to pay higher child support would generally
commence at that time. Therefore, a
child support payor could owe substantial amounts for retroactive child support
if his/her income has increased since the original settlement date. Ontario
Disagrees On
May 19, 2005, the Ontario Court of Appeal repudiated the Alberta Ruling by
directing Judges not to routinely order payor parents to pay retroactive child
support to custodial parents. The
Ontario Court Ruled that Trial Judges should only “sparingly” order child
support for the months prior to the date on which a custodial parent formally
applies for support. ARREARS In
a February 25, 2005 Supreme Court of Canada case, the Court found that a
lump-sum “disability payment” for arrears was taxable. Even
though there have been a number of alimony arrears cases that found that an
arrears settlement was non-taxable/non-deductible, this status may change in the
future because of this finding.
FORM
T3010A Persons
filing a Charitable Organization return for a fiscal period that begins after
March 22, 2004 should use new Form
T3010A(05). NEW
FUNDING PROGRAM On
May 17, 2005, the Minister of National Revenue launched the Charities
Partnership and Outreach Program to support compliance-related education and
training projects for charities. Up
to $3 million in funds will be available to the voluntary sector annually for
education and training on charities regulations to a maximum of $500,000 per
year per project. Any
registered charity or non-profit organization serving the charitable sector can
apply to CRA for funding. PRIVATE
GIVING FOUNDATION
For a list of Community Foundations that provide a structure for tax deductible charitable giving see
www.community-fdn.ca. DONATION
THROUGH THE WILL The
Income Tax Act permits a donation made through the Will to be claimed on the
Terminal Return of the deceased taxpayer. CRA
usually considers that a gift by the Will of a specific percentage of the
residue will be eligible. However,
if the residue of the Estate is dependent on decisions to be made by the
Executor (for example, amounts to be paid to grandchildren) then the donation is
in the Estate, not the Terminal Return of the deceased. ETHNOCULTURAL
COMMUNITIES
ROLLOVER
TO FINANCIALLY DEPENDENT CHILDREN
Where a financially dependent child or
grandchild receives, on the death of a person, a distribution from the
deceased’s RRSP or RRIF, the child, not the deceased taxpayer, includes the
amount in income. However, an
offsetting deduction is permitted if the amount is used to acquire a specific
type of annuity, including a life annuity where the child or grandchild is
dependent by reason of physical or mental infirmity or, an annuity payable up to
the age of 18 for other dependent children or grandchildren. In
an April 6, 2005 External Technical Interpretation, CRA noted that a
“Henson” style Trust could be used to safeguard a disabled beneficiary’s
entitlement to social assistance. U.S.
DIVIDENDS AND INTEREST Where
a Registered Retirement Savings Plan receives U.S. dividends or interest, there
should be no U.S. withholding tax. REGISTERED
RETIREMENT INCOME FUND (RRIF) BENEFICIARY
FULL
FARMING LOSS DEDUCTION In
a May 6, 2005 Tax Court of Canada case, the taxpayer was a full-time employee
earning employment income of $45,000. At
the same time, he operated a barley grain farm on 320 acres and had losses in
the year which he claimed fully against his employment income.
CRA restricted the losses on the basis that farming was not his principal
preoccupation. Taxpayer
Wins! The
Court permitted the full deduction for the farm losses and noted that the losses
had to do with circumstances beyond the taxpayer’s control. CANADIAN
AGRICULTURAL INCOME STABILIZATION (CAIS) DECISION
TELEPHONE
SERVICE
Nowadays, most computers come with energy
saving modes that allow you to keep your computer on without a break.
Why would you want to leave your computer on?
One reason is to use it as a free telephone. Yahoo
has introduced a free beta test computer phone service.
This is basically an extension of the current Yahoo Messenger service
(similar to MSN Messenger). If you have clients or coworkers that are located in offices
to which long distance charges would apply to telephone communications, consider
using this free service. What
one needs to do: 1. Download
the Yahoo Messenger beta 7 program from www.yahoo.ca 2. Install
the program 3. Plug in a Microphone 4. Sign up for a free
Yahoo email account if you don’t already have one ( 1 Gigabyte of space) 5. Add
your friends or contacts How
it works: 1. You select the
contact you would like to call and then hit the “call” ICON. 2. The other person’s
computer will then begin to ring like a normal telephone. 3. The other person
would then click “accept” on the pop-up message that appears on the screen. 4. Both parties could
then start talking as if they were on a normal telephone call. PHOTOS
– SHARE WITH FRIENDS AND COLLEAGUES ONLINE One
way to share electronic pictures with friends, family and colleagues is to send
them by email. Although
convenient, one encounters two problems: The
first is that you have to spend time waiting for each photo to attach to the
message. If you send the photo 10
different times, you would have to wait for that one photo to attach each of
those 10 times. The second problem
is that some email service providers have limits on the size and number of files
you can send. In order to send a
series of photos you might have to waste your time sending several messages. Solution Consider
storing your photos online and simply sending a link to them every time you want
to share them. This can be done by
opening a free account at one of the following websites: www.hpphoto.com
(being transferred to www.snapfish.com) VENDOR
DOES NOT REMIT GST In
an Excise Tax Act case, the taxpayer bought vehicles and paid GST to the vendor
but the vendor did not remit the GST to CRA.
CRA argued that the purchaser must then remit the GST for which they
claimed an input tax credit. The
Court concluded that this is ludicrous, as long as the purchaser can prove that
they have paid the GST, because the vendor is acting as the agent of CRA (The
Bottom Line, January 2004, Page 20).
CARRYING
ON BUSINESS IN CANADA Every
non-resident person who carries on business in Canada, other than a small
supplier, must register for GST/HST if the non-resident person makes a taxable
supply in Canada. GST/HST
REGISTRATION CANCELLATION GST/HST
Memoranda Series 2.7 discusses Cancellation of Registration including the
required conditions, responsibilities and obligations upon GST/HST cancellation. COMPUTERIZED
RECORDS In
June, 2005, CRA introduced GST/HST Memoranda 15.2 Computerized Records. The
11-page Guide discusses electronic records, retention of records, inspections,
audits and examinations, and lost, damaged or inadequate records. CANPASS
AIR - BORDER CLEARANCE On
March 24, 2005 CRA introduced Guide RC4344 which discusses the CANPASS Air
Service for pre-approved commercial airline travellers.
|
||